The list of the Indonesian leader who became the teacher could be very long if one by one was named here. Mentioned like Ki Hadjar Dewantara, Djuanda, or Ratulangie (Daniel Dhakidae had written by attracting the quality of the teacher in himself Ratulangie). With intelegensi (cognition) above in general and the attitude lived (affection) that was sincere served in the independence goal (that often was raised by the social experience like Tan Malacca), did not surprise if leading figures like Soekarno, Hatta, and Tan Malacca easily changed places from a teacher afterwards was the leader of the mass.
If in their room taught the subject to count, read, and wrote, in the field, their movement educated the awareness of the people would the importance of independence. And, the pupil of the teachers who changed clothes to the leader was throughout the Dutch East Indies inhabitants, with the classroom along Sabang-Merauke. With the structure of the awareness of the kind, it is not surprising that in Indonesia the term the founding fathers easily was bartered just like that with the "national leader's" term.
Don't be surprised also if George Washington or Thomas Jefferson in America only was mentioned as the founding fathers and had not been acknowledged as the "national leader". Because the national leader's term, my foreknowledge, was not printed in the structure of the awareness of the American nation.
With the teacher's qualification like that has been explained by me, each good teacher in fact was the midwife who could give birth to the good leader. With this kind train of thought, we could put forward the further question: if now we experience the leadership crisis, maybe this indicated we were experiencing the teacher's good crisis? Or the transformation in our awareness about the meaning and the position of the teacher was happening to not more as the teacher?

The list of the Indonesian leader who became the teacher could be very long if one by one was named here. Mentioned like Ki Hadjar Dewantara, Djuanda, or Ratulangie (Daniel Dhakidae had written by attracting the quality of the teacher in himself Ratulangie). With intelegensi (cognition) above in general and the attitude lived (affection) that was sincere served in the independence goal (that often was raised by the social experience like Tan Malacca), did not surprise if leading figures like Soekarno, Hatta, and Tan Malacca easily changed places from a teacher afterwards was the leader of the mass.
If in their room taught the subject to count, read, and wrote, in the field, their movement educated the awareness of the people would the importance of independence. And, the pupil of the teachers who changed clothes to the leader was throughout the Dutch East Indies inhabitants, with the classroom along Sabang-Merauke. With the structure of the awareness of the kind, it is not surprising that in Indonesia the term the founding fathers easily was bartered just like that with the "national leader's" term.
Don't be surprised also if George Washington or Thomas Jefferson in America only was mentioned as the founding fathers and had not been acknowledged as the "national leader". Because the national leader's term, my foreknowledge, was not printed in the structure of the awareness of the American nation.
With the teacher's qualification like that has been explained by me, each good teacher in fact was the midwife who could give birth to the good leader. With this kind train of thought, we could put forward the further question: if now we experience the leadership crisis, maybe this indicated we were experiencing the teacher's good crisis? Or the transformation in our awareness about the meaning and the position of the teacher was happening to not more as the teacher?