Entered the age to our 21 faced big changes and very fundamental dilingkungan global. The change in the strategic environment in this global order was reflected in the formation of forums like GATT, the WTO, and APEC, NAFTA and AFTA, IMG-GT, IMS-GT, BIMP-EAGA, and SOSEKMALINDO that were efforts to welcome free trade where definitely will take place the level of the very tight competition. A change in the regulation that originally the monopoly (monopoly) became the free competition (free competition). Likewise, happened to the market that initially was oriented to the product (product oriented) changed in the orientation of the market (market driven), as well as from the protection (protection) moved to the free market (free market).
The progress of economics diberbagai the country, really was related to the quality of human resources. For example Singapore and Japan. Although nature resources that were owned by him limited, but because the quality of his human resources was superior, the two countries became the leader of economics in the Asian region. So must anticipate this situation by reinforcing the competitive capacity diberbagai the field with the development of human resources. Unfortunately our human resources at this time worrying, according to UNDP. Indonesia occupied the level 109 from 174, the level of competitiveness to –46 that was lowest in the South-East Asian region, Singapore the 2, Malaysia the 27. Phillipina to –32, and Tailand to –34, and including the most corrupt country in the world.
Towards the increase in human resources, the role of quite prominent education. From the experience of several countries showed that in heading the structural change, with the increase in the development of economics happened the proportion of manpower under basic education that increasingly became smaller, whereas the proportion tengan the work was educated middle and high increasingly increased. Was different from the other country that experienced remained at the base, the educated proportion the foundation and middle in Korea mid the 70 's was big enough that is 19 percent to be not educated, 43 percent were educated the foundation, 31 percent were educated middle and 7 percent were educated high (Macharany, 1990). Further, Swasono judo and Boediono (Macharany, 1990) said that the structure of Indonesian manpower during 1985 was 53 percent was not educated, 34 percent were educated the foundation, 11 percent berpendidiian middle and 2 percent were educated high. When we want to reached remained at the base like Korea, it was estimated the structure of manpower according to education in three growth scenarios of the GDP per capita, that is low 6 percent, while 7 percent, and high 8 on 2019.
In the autonomy era of the area of the strategic policy that was taken by Directorate General Pendidikan Dasar and Middle in increasing the quality of education to develop human resources was: (1) the Management of the increase in the based quality of the school (school based management) where the school was given by the authority to plan personally increase efforts in the quality on the whole; (2) Education that have as a base in the community's participation (community based education) where the interaction that was positive between the school happening to the community, the school as community learning center; and (3) By using the studying paradigm or learning paradigm that will make students or learner became humankind that was empowered. Moreover to the government announced a national movement for the increase in the quality of education, at the same time delivered the expansion of the Broad Base Education System approach (BBE) that gave the provisioning to the student to be ready to work built the prosperous family. With the approach of each student was expected to get the provisioning life skills that contained the understanding that was wide and deep about the environment and his capacity so that close and gave mutual benefits.

Entered the age to our 21 faced big changes and very fundamental dilingkungan global. The change in the strategic environment in this global order was reflected in the formation of forums like GATT, the WTO, and APEC, NAFTA and AFTA, IMG-GT, IMS-GT, BIMP-EAGA, and SOSEKMALINDO that were efforts to welcome free trade where definitely will take place the level of the very tight competition. A change in the regulation that originally the monopoly (monopoly) became the free competition (free competition). Likewise, happened to the market that initially was oriented to the product (product oriented) changed in the orientation of the market (market driven), as well as from the protection (protection) moved to the free market (free market).
The progress of economics diberbagai the country, really was related to the quality of human resources. For example Singapore and Japan. Although nature resources that were owned by him limited, but because the quality of his human resources was superior, the two countries became the leader of economics in the Asian region. So must anticipate this situation by reinforcing the competitive capacity diberbagai the field with the development of human resources. Unfortunately our human resources at this time worrying, according to UNDP. Indonesia occupied the level 109 from 174, the level of competitiveness to –46 that was lowest in the South-East Asian region, Singapore the 2, Malaysia the 27. Phillipina to –32, and Tailand to –34, and including the most corrupt country in the world.
Towards the increase in human resources, the role of quite prominent education. From the experience of several countries showed that in heading the structural change, with the increase in the development of economics happened the proportion of manpower under basic education that increasingly became smaller, whereas the proportion tengan the work was educated middle and high increasingly increased. Was different from the other country that experienced remained at the base, the educated proportion the foundation and middle in Korea mid the 70 's was big enough that is 19 percent to be not educated, 43 percent were educated the foundation, 31 percent were educated middle and 7 percent were educated high (Macharany, 1990). Further, Swasono judo and Boediono (Macharany, 1990) said that the structure of Indonesian manpower during 1985 was 53 percent was not educated, 34 percent were educated the foundation, 11 percent berpendidiian middle and 2 percent were educated high. When we want to reached remained at the base like Korea, it was estimated the structure of manpower according to education in three growth scenarios of the GDP per capita, that is low 6 percent, while 7 percent, and high 8 on 2019.
In the autonomy era of the area of the strategic policy that was taken by Directorate General Pendidikan Dasar and Middle in increasing the quality of education to develop human resources was: (1) the Management of the increase in the based quality of the school (school based management) where the school was given by the authority to plan personally increase efforts in the quality on the whole; (2) Education that have as a base in the community's participation (community based education) where the interaction that was positive between the school happening to the community, the school as community learning center; and (3) By using the studying paradigm or learning paradigm that will make students or learner became humankind that was empowered. Moreover to the government announced a national movement for the increase in the quality of education, at the same time delivered the expansion of the Broad Base Education System approach (BBE) that gave the provisioning to the student to be ready to work built the prosperous family. With the approach of each student was expected to get the provisioning life skills that contained the understanding that was wide and deep about the environment and his capacity so that close and gave mutual benefits.